NEO U22-XJ: Expected Benchmark Results (based off 003A FW)

Status
Not open for further replies.

John_S

Trusted Helper
Below are the expected benchmark results for MINIX NEO U22-XJ based off 003A FW.

Please note, NEO U22-XJ's Clock Speed is 1.8GHz.

AnTuTu V8.3.3

Total Score = 120,158
CPU Score = 50,816
GPU Score = 15,915
MEM Score = 26,597
UX Score = 26,830

Geekbench 4

Single-Core Score = 1,240
Multi-Core Score = 3,388
RenderScript Score = 2,605

---

Last month, I posted a photo of NEO U22-XJ achieving a total score of 137,768 on AnTuTu V8.3.2.

Unknown to me at the time, this photo was taken by one of our engineers when the NEO U22-XJ was running an experimental 2.2GHz firmware.

So, this photo gave an unfair representation of NEO U22-XJ's performance when running 003 FW / 003A FW.

It was an honest mistake and miscommunication, my apologies for any confusion.

---

So why do we set NEO U22-XJ to 1.8GHz when it's possible to achieve higher results at 2.2GHz? The overwhelming reason is stability.

We opt for stability and overall performance of 1.8GHz over the gains of 2.2GHz.

While the benchmark scores are higher when running at 2.2GHz, we do not believe there is a noticeable benefit during normal daily usage.
 

Attachments

  • AnTuTu V8.3.3.png
    AnTuTu V8.3.3.png
    78.6 KB · Views: 34
  • Geekbench 4 - Compute.png
    Geekbench 4 - Compute.png
    85 KB · Views: 32
  • Geekbench 4 - CPU.png
    Geekbench 4 - CPU.png
    89 KB · Views: 28
Thanks, that's indeed pretty much what I got myself in Antutu (give or take few points more):

Total: 120,473 = +30.9%
CPU: 50,753 = +61.3%
GPU: 16,014 = +3.4%
MEM: 26,881 = +12.4%
UX: 26,825 = +26.7%

The % points are gains compared to v002.
 
Thanks, that's indeed pretty much what I got myself in Antutu (give or take few points more):

Total: 120,473 = +30.9%
CPU: 50,753 = +61.3%
GPU: 16,014 = +3.4%
MEM: 26,881 = +12.4%
UX: 26,825 = +26.7%

The % points are gains compared to v002.
Thanks for highlighting the % gains compared to 002FW (y)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top